+91 90263 49246Sourabh9506@gmail.comMon–Fri: 10AM – 6PM, Sat: 10AM – 2PM
Book Appointment
Home/Legal Guides/Cheque Bounce Cases (S.138 NI Act): Timeline & Process

Legal Guide

Cheque Bounce Cases (S.138 NI Act): Timeline & Process

Last reviewed: 2026-07-28 · Reviewed by Adv. Sourabh Rawat, Advocate, High Court Lucknow Bench

Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 makes the dishonour of a cheque — most commonly for insufficient funds — a criminal offence, but only if a strict sequence of notices and deadlines is followed correctly. Missing any one of these deadlines can affect whether a complaint can proceed at all, which is why this guide walks through the timeline step by step.

Who Needs This Guide

This guide is for anyone who has received a bounced cheque and is considering filing a complaint, and equally for anyone who has issued a cheque that has bounced and has received a legal notice. Both sides are bound by the same statutory timeline, and understanding it is the essential first step regardless of which side you're on.

The Full Statutory Timeline

Section 138 proceedings follow a specific, four-step sequence:

  1. Cheque dishonour. The bank returns the cheque unpaid — typically for insufficient funds, "account closed," or a signature mismatch — along with a return memo stating the reason for dishonour.
  2. Demand notice — within 30 days. The payee must send a written notice to the drawer demanding payment of the cheque amount, within 30 days of receiving the bank's return memo. This step is where the criminal liability under Section 138 is actually triggered — without a valid notice within this window, there is no cause of action.
  3. Drawer's 15 days to pay. From the date the drawer receives the demand notice, they have 15 days to make the payment. If payment is made in full within this period, no offence arises at all.
  4. Complaint — within 1 month. If payment is not made within the 15-day window, the payee must file a criminal complaint within one month of that 15-day period lapsing.

Each of these windows is calculated from a specific triggering event — the return memo date, the date of receipt of the notice, and the date the 15-day period ends — so keeping a clear record of these dates from the outset is essential.

Drafting the Demand Notice Correctly

The demand notice is the foundation of the entire case, and several defects commonly cause avoidable problems later:

  • Sending it outside the 30-day window — even a well-drafted notice sent late can undermine the complaint.
  • Using an incorrect or outdated address for the drawer, which can later be disputed as improper service.
  • Vague or incomplete details — the notice should clearly identify the cheque (number, date, amount, bank) and state the amount being demanded.
  • No proof of service — keeping postal receipts, courier tracking, or acknowledgment of delivery is essential, since the drawer's receipt of the notice (or valid deemed service) is often contested at trial.

Filing the Complaint

If payment is not made within the drawer's 15-day window, the complaint is filed before the Magistrate having jurisdiction — generally where the cheque was presented for collection through the payee's bank branch, following the settled jurisdictional rule on this point. The complaint is typically supported by the original cheque, the bank's return memo, a copy of the demand notice with proof of service, and any underlying agreement or invoice evidencing the debt.

Interim Compensation — Section 143A

While the trial is pending, the court can direct the drawer to pay the complainant interim compensation of up to 20% of the cheque amount, under Section 143A of the Act. This is meant to provide some financial relief to the payee during what can be a lengthy trial process, and is distinct from the final compensation or fine that may eventually be ordered if the complaint succeeds.

Trial Procedure

Section 138 complaints are generally tried in a summary manner — a streamlined procedure compared to a regular criminal trial — though the court can convert the case to a summons trial if it considers a sentence of more than one year's imprisonment may be warranted. The complainant's evidence, including their own testimony, is recorded first, followed by the drawer's defence evidence, before the court decides the matter. The maximum punishment provided is imprisonment of up to two years, or a fine which may extend to twice the cheque amount, or both — though the actual sentence or fine depends entirely on the facts as found by the trial court.

Settlement and Compounding

Section 138 is a compoundable offence, meaning the parties can settle at any stage — before the complaint is filed, after it is filed, or even during trial. Once a genuine compromise is reached and recorded by the court, the case is closed. For many parties, especially where the underlying relationship (business or personal) is worth preserving, settlement is a faster and less adversarial route than a full trial.

Defence Side Overview

For a drawer facing a Section 138 complaint, the defence generally turns on the specific facts: whether the cheque was genuinely issued for an existing, legally enforceable debt at the time it was issued; whether the cheque was given only as security and misused; and whether the demand notice itself was properly drafted and served within the statutory window. Each of these is examined against the actual documents and communications between the parties, rather than assumed to apply generally.

When to Involve an Advocate

Involve an advocate as soon as a cheque bounces — the 30-day window to send the demand notice is one of the shortest and least forgiving deadlines in this area of law, and a notice drafted or served incorrectly can undermine an otherwise strong case. If you are the drawer and have received a demand notice, involve an advocate before the 15-day payment window lapses, since your response (payment, settlement, or preparing a defence) needs to be decided within that period. See our cheque bounce lawyer in Lucknow page for the full service — Advocate Sourabh Rawat represents both payees and drawers in Section 138 matters before the courts in Lucknow.

Common Questions

Cheque Bounce Cases (S.138 NI Act): Timeline & ProcessFrequently Asked Questions

Need Help With This? See Our Services

This page is for general information only and does not constitute legal advice or solicitation. Outcomes depend on the facts of each case. As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, this website does not advertise or solicit work.

WhatsApp Now